Intervenţiile de regenerare urbană: factori, beneficii şi modele de succes / Urban regeneration interventions: factors, benefits and success examples
Alina Ioana Cârciumărescu
Rezumat/Abstract. Urban regeneration has evolved from physical reconstruction and urban expansion towards integrated strategies addressing economic, social, environmental, spatial and institutional challenges. This paper examines the main factors influencing the initiation and success of regeneration processes, focusing on sustainable development, economic revitalization, social cohesion, environmental performance, spatial planning, heritage conservation, community participation and governance. Attention is given to the role of public-private partnerships, local communities, cultural and creative industries, technological innovation and adaptive reuse in shaping resilient urban environments. The analysis also considers the influence of economic decline, deindustrialization, social exclusion, real-estate dynamics and contextual crises on establishing the regeneration priorities. Beyond the physical renewal of urban areas, regeneration may contribute to strengthening the local economies by creating employment opportunities, supporting entrepreneurship, attracting investment and fostering resilient local economies based on proximity and functional diversity. The paper presents a comparative analysis of successful regeneration projects showing how integrated, place-sensitive and long-term strategies can balance economic development, social equity, environmental sustainability and preservation of the local urban identity.
Cuvinte cheie/Key words: strategy, urban regeneration, urban management, sustainable development, public space
Bibliografie/References
1. Amirtahmasebi, R., Orloff, M., Wahba, S., Altman, A. (2016), Regenerating Urban Land: A Practitioner’s Guide to Leveraging Private Investment, World Bank, Washington, D.C., SUA, https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/publication/regenerating-urban-land-a-practitioners-guide-to-leveraging-private-investment
2. Aronson, B. A. (2022), Evolving Legacy: An Exploratory Path into Uncovering and Sustaining a Practice’s Accumulated Knowledge, teză de doctorat, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia, https://research-repository.rmit.edu.au/articles/thesis/Evolving_legacy_an_exploratory_path_into_uncovering_and_sustaining_a_practice_s_accumulated_knowledge/27598989?file=50795016
3. Bae, C.-H. C., Richardson, H. W., Kim, H. (2014), „Urban regeneration and gentrification: Land use impacts of the Cheonggye Stream Restoration Project on the Seoul's central business district” Habitat International, 44, 1-9, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.12.004
4. Bethlehem, L. (2013), „A new dynamic – urban regeneration in the Jo'burg CBD” The Journal of the Helen Suzman Foundation, 69, 17-24, https://hsf.org.za/publications/focus/focus-69-future-of-our-cities/focus69jun-3-l-bethlehem.pdf
5. BILBAO Ría 2000 (2026), Abandoibarra, [Online]. Disponibil la: https://www.bilbaoria2000.org/en/actions/abandoibarra/, [Accesat 22 august 2026].
6. Boonstra, B., Lofvers, W. (2017), „Rotterdam: Do-It-Yourself Assemblages in Urban Regeneration”, DISP, 53 (1), 6–17, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2017.1316499
7. City of New York (1985), Brief Amicus Curiae of the City of New York in Support of Respondents, New York, SUA
8. City of New York (2005), Brief Amicus Curiae of the City of New York in Support of Respondents, [Online]. Disponibil la: https://www.nyc.gov/html/law/downloads/pdf/kelobrief.pdf, [Accesat 22 august 2026]
9. City of Pančevo (CoP) (2014), City of Pančevo Development Strategy 2014–2020, [Online], Disponibil la: https://www.pancevo.rs/sadrzaj/uploads/2014/07/City-of-Pancevo-Development-Strategy.pdf, [Accesat 18 septembrie 2022]
10. CONPET (2014), Plan de Administrare 2014–2017, [Online], Disponibil la: https://www.conpet.ro/Actionariat/Document/AGA/2014/27.03/Pct.%201%20-%20Plan%20de%20Administrare%20a%20Conpet.pdf, [Accesat 18 septembrie 2022]
11. Corporación Antiguo Puerto Madero S.A. (2026), Puerto Madero, [Online], Disponibil la: https://cpm.ar/, [Accesat 23 august 2026]
12. Didier, S., Peyroux, E., Morange, M. (2012), „The Spreading of the City Improvement District Model in Johannesburg and Cape Town: Urban Regeneration and the Neoliberal Agenda in South Africa” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36 (5), 915-35, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01136.x
13. Echter, I., Iván, A. și Molnár, Gy. (1995), Kerületi koncepció-vázlat, https://mijozsefvarosunk.blog.hu/2013/04/07/keruleti_koncepcio-vazlat_1995_08_23
14. Hantz Woodlands (2026), Our Story, [Online], Disponibil la: https://www.hantzfarmsdetroit.com/ourstory.html, [Accesat 22 august 2026]
15. Hebrew University of Jerusalem (2026), Transportation, [Online], Disponibil la: https://en.huji.ac.il/our-campuses, [Accesat 22 august 2026]
16. Hwang, K., Kim, J., Park, M. (2005), „Value Conflict on Sustainability and Consensus Building – The Case of Cheonggyecheon Restoration Project” Seoul Urban Studies, 6 (2), 57-78, DOI: http://doi.org/10.23129/seouls.6.2.200506.57
17. Johannesburg Development Agency – JDA (2009), Inner City Urban Design Implementation Plan, Johannesburg, Africa de Sud
18. Johannesburg Development Agency – JDA (2012), Annual Report 2011/12, Johannesburg, Africa de Sud
19. Johannesburg Development Agency – JDA (2018), Inner City, [Online]. Disponibil la: https://www.jda.org.za/inner-city-2/, [Accesat 22 august 2026].
20. Juaristi, J. (2003), „El Patrimonio histórico industrial y la revitalización urbana y económica de Bilbao” PH: Boletín del Instituto Andaluz del Patrimonio Histórico, 42, 79-87, DOI: https://doi.org/10.33349/2003.42.1481
21. Kamrowska-Załuska, D. (2017), „Buenos Aires – Toward Comprehensive Development and Sustainable Mobility” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 245 (6), 062022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/245/6/062022
22. Kotze, N., De Vries, L. (2019), „Resuscitating the African giant: Urban regeneration and inner city redevelopment initiatives along the ‘Corridors of Freedom’ in downtown Johannesburg” Geographia Polonica, 92 (1), 57-70, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0136
23. Mak, A., Stouten, P. (2014), „Urban Regeneration in Rotterdam: Economic and Social Values”, European Spatial Research and Policy, 21 (1), 101–122, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/esrp-2014-0008
24. Marlet, G., Larsen, V. (2012), MKBA Spangen ex-post, https://atlasresearch.nl/wp-content/uploads/LPBL-MKBA-10-jaar-investeren-in-Spangen.pdf
25. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2014), Urban Development and Economic Competitiveness, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., SUA
26. Nedeianu, O. N. (2025), „Regenerarea urbană, o sursă a sustenabilității și a conservării identității locale / Urban regeneration, a source of sustainability and conservation of local identity”, Revista Şcolii Doctorale de Urbanism, 10, 29–40, DOI: https://doi.org/10.54508/rsdu.2025.03
27. NIS (2017), Annual Report 2017, [Online], Disponibil la: https://ir.nis.rs/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/NIS_AR_2017_eng.pdf, [Accesat 18 septembrie 2022]
28. NIS (2016), „NIS Successfully Completes the Project of Modernisation of Pančevo Oil Refinery”, [Online], Disponibil la: https://www.nis.rs/en/news-archive/nis-successfully-completes-the-project-of-modernisation-of-pancevo-oil-refinery/, [Accesat 18 septembrie 2022]
29. New York City Department of City Planning (2014), Notice of Intent to Acquire Office Space at One MetroTech Center, New York, SUA
30. Oser, A. S. (1985), „MetroTech: A Test for a New Form of Urban Renewal” The New York Times, 6 ianuarie 1985, https://www.nytimes.com/1985/01/06/realestate/metrotech-a-test-for-a-new-form-of-urban-renewal.html
31. Peyroux, E. (2006), „City Improvement Districts (CIDs) in Johannesburg: Assessing the political and socio-spatial implications of private-led urban regeneration”, Transformation, 66, 1-24, https://hal.science/hal-00284371
32. Plaza, B. (2006), „The Return on Investment of the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30 (2), 452-67, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00672.x
33. Pullan, W., Misselwitz, P. (2013), Separation or interaction? The contested urbanism of Jerusalem City, 17 (3), 345-63
34. Pothukuchi, K. (2017), „To allow farming is to give up on the city: Political anxieties related to the disposition of vacant land for urban agriculture in Detroit” Journal of Urban Affairs, 39 (8), 1169-89, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2017.1319239
35. Ramírez-Casas, J. (2014), „El proyecto del espacio público en la ciudad global. De los planes a la ejecución – Puerto Madero (Buenos Aires)” Gestión y Ambiente, 17 (1), 59-67
36. Rieh, S. Y., Chang, J. (2018), „Seoul, South Korea: Dismantling a highway – Cheonggyecheon Restoration Project”, în Routledge Handbook of Urban Design, Routledge, Londra, Regatul Unit, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351124225-9
37. Roberts, P. (2000) ‘The evolution, definition, and purpose of urban regeneration’, in Roberts, P. and Sykes, H. (eds.) Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219980.n2
38. Safransky, S. (2014), „Greening the urban frontier: Race, property, and resettlement in Detroit” Geoforum, 56, 237-48, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.06.003
39. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2006), Cheonggyecheon Restoration, [Online]. Disponibil la: https://english.seoul.go.kr/service/amusement/stream/1-cheonggyecheon/, [Accesat 23 august 2026]
40. University of Michigan (2022), Urban agriculture in Detroit: Scattering vs. clustering and the prospects for scaling up, [Online]. Disponibil la: https://detroit.umich.edu/news-stories/urban-agriculture-in-detroit-scattering-vs-clustering-and-the-prospects-for-scaling-up/, [Accesat 22 august 2026]
41. Urban Renewal Strategy (2000), Johannesburg Inner City Development Strategy, City of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, Africa de Sud
42. World Bank (2016), How Eight Cities Succeeded in Rejuvenating their Urban Land, [Online]. Disponibil la: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2016/07/13/How-eight-cities-succeeded-in-rejuvenating-their-urban-land, [Accesat 23 august 2026]
43. World Bank (2016), Regenerating Urban Land: A Practitioner’s Guide to Leveraging Private Investment, World Bank, Washington, D.C., SUA, https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/publication/regenerating-urban-land-a-practitioners-guide-to-leveraging-private-investment
44. Yiftachel, O. (2006), Ethnocracy: Land and Identity Politics in Israel/Palestine, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, SUA, https://www.jstor.org/stable/41805021
45. ZF (2018), „ZF Invests in Expanding its Electromobility Production Capacity”, [Online], Disponibil la: https://press.zf.com/press/en/releases/release_2908.html, [Accesat 18 septembrie 2022]
46. Zhu, Y., González Martínez, P. (2022), „Heritage, values and gentrification: the redevelopment of historic areas in China” International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28 (4), 476-94, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.2010791
Text integral/Full text