Rezumat/Abstract. Space is the basic concept of geographical analysis, and the spatial relations established between the different elements of the environment are those that structure the planable territory. On a temporal scale, the European space was shaped by a variety of vectors, which ultimately sought to make the use of the geographical landscape more efficient, implicitly by increasing accessibility between expanding cities, between supply and demand. Accessibility is the main "product" of a transport system. This determines the advantage of positioning one region over the others (including itself). Accessibility indicators can be defined to reflect, within or outside the region, the transport infrastructure affecting the region. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are used as scientific and methodological tools for measuring accessibility, monitoring the resulting indicators, identifying spatial disparities and finally finding solutions to support territorial planning.

Cuvinte cheie/Key words: transport, indicators, spatial planning, travel times, linear networks, cost surface model, cost weighted distance

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54508/rsdu.2019.05

Bibliografie/References

1. Ahern, A., Hine, J. (2012), „Rural transport and valuing the mobility of older people”, Research in Transportation Economics, 34(1), 27-34, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2011.12.004
2. Ahlfeldt, G.M., Feddersen, A. (2010), „From periphery to core: economic adjustments to high speed rail”, IEB Working Paper 2010/36, https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/29430/1/From_periphery_to_core_%28LSERO_version%29.pdf
3. Bailey, T.C., Gatrell, A.C. (1995), „Interactive spatial data analysis (Vol. 413) ”, Essex: Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, United Kingdom, https://books.google.ro/books/about/Interactive_Spatial_Data_Analysis.html?id=WwbvAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
4. Biehl, D. (1986), „The Contribution of Infrastructure to Regional Development”, Final Report of the Infrastructure Studies Group to the Commission of the European Communities. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
5. Biehl D. (1991), „The role of infrastructure in regional development” in Vickerman, R.W. (Ed.): Infrastructure and Regional Development. European Research in Regional Science 1. London: Pion, 9-35, Great Britain
6. Bökemann, D. (1982), „Theorie der Raumplanung”, Regionalwissenschaftliche Grundlagen für die Stadt-, Regional-und Landesplanung. München, Wien: Oldenbourg
7. Comisia Europeană (2010), „Europa 2020. O strategie europeană pentru o creştere inteligentă, ecologică şi favorabilă incluziunii”, Bruxelles, accesibilă la: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:RO:PDF
8. Julião, R.P. (1998), „Measuring Accessibility: a GIS based methodology for accessibility evaluation”, in GIS PlaNET'98 Proceedings, GIS PlaNET, 98
9. Katsios, I., Tsatsaris, A., Sakellariou, A. (2006), „Spatial typology of the Greek territory based on transport accessibility indicators: A cartographical approach using GIS”, 46th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Enlargement, Southern Europe and the Mediterranean", August 30th - September 3rd, 2006, Volos, Greece, http://hypatia.teiath.gr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11400/18913/159.pdf?sequence=1
10. Keeble D., Owens P.L., Thompson C. (1982), „Regional accessibility and economic potential in the European Community”, Regional Studies 16(6), 419-432, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09595238200185421
11. Lutter, H., Pütz, T., Spangenberg, M. (1993), „Lage und Erreichbarkeit der Regionen in der EG und der Einfluß der Fernverkehrssysteme”, Forschungen zur Raumentwicklung Band 23, Bonn: Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landeskunde und Raumordnung
12. Oprea, M. (2012), „Impactul dezvoltării infrastructurii de turism asupra turismului din Transilvania”, Teza de doctorat, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, România, https://doctorat.ubbcluj.ro/sustinerea_publica/rezumate/2012/geografie/Oprea%20Marius_George_RO.pdf
13. Raicu, Ş., Popa, M. (2009), „Transporturile şi Amenajarea Teritoriului – Accesibilitate şi Atractivitate”, Buletinul AGIR nr. 4, Bucureşti, România, https://www.agir.ro/buletine/496.pdf
14. Samanta, S., Jha, M.K., Oluokun, C.O. (2005), „Travel time calculation with GIS in rail station location optimization”, In Proceedings of the 25th ESRI International User Conference, San Diego, USA, pag. 1-9, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Manoj-Jha-8/publication/228941721_Travel_Time_Calculation_With_GIS_in_Rail_Station_Location_Optimization/links/621050b708bee946f38d15d1/Travel-Time-Calculation-With-GIS-in-Rail-Station-Location-Optimization.pdf?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19
15. Skov-Petersen H. (2001), „Estimation of distance-decay parameters: GIS-based indicators of recreational accessibility”, in Proceedings of the 8th Scandinavian Research Conference on Geographical Information Science, ScanGIS 2001, 25th - 27th June 2001, Ås, Norway pag.237-258, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hans-Skov-Petersen/publication/228698631_Estimation_of_Distance_Decay_Parameters_-_GIS_Based_Indicators_of_Recreational_Accessibility/links/5bb65f9092851c7fde2e8916/Estimation-of-Distance-Decay-Parameters-GIS-Based-Indicators-of-Recreational-Accessibility.pdf?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19
16. Spiekermann, K., Wegener, M. (2008), „The shrinking continent: accessibility, competitiveness and cohesion, In: Faludi, A. (Ed.): European Spatial Research and Planning. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, USA, pag. 115-140, https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/books/european-spatial-research-planning/
17. Tache, A., Popescu, O. (2014), „Gis Model to evaluate the accessibility to major transport ways”, Urbanism. Arhitectură. Construcţii, 6(1), 29-36, https://uac.incd.ro/Art/v6n1a03.pdf
18. Tache, A., Popescu, O., Petrişor, A.I. (2015), ”Strategic Planning for the Development of the Danube Area”, Romanian Review of Regional Studies, 10(2), 3-14, https://rrrs.reviste.ubbcluj.ro/site/arhive/Artpdf/v10n22014/RRRS10220142.pdf
19. Tache, A.V., Petrişor, A.I. (2017), „GIS-based IT model for assessing territorial accessibility in Romania”, Algerian Journal of Engineering Architecture and Urbanism, 1(2), 13-23
20. Tache, A.V., Manole, S.D., Petrişor, A.I. (2018), „Metropolization of large urban centers in Romania: Analyses and solutions”, Algerian Journal of Engineering Architecture and Urbanism , 2(1), 8-17
21. Tache, A.V., Popescu, O.C., Manole, S.D., Petrişor, A.I. (2018), „Methodology for assessing the Romanian Funtional Urban Areas using GIS and LAU2 Territorial Indicators”, Territorial Identity and Development, 3(1), pag. 2-23, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334813553_Methodology_for_Assessing_the_Romanian_Functional_Urban_Areas_Using_GIS_and_LAU_2_Territorial_Indicators
22. Tóth, G., Kincses, Á. (2011), „Factors of accessibility potential models”, Regional Science Inquiry Journal, 3(1), 27-44, https://www.rsijournal.eu/ARTICLES/December_2011/27-44.pdf
23. Urbanproiect (2008), Studiu de fundamentare a Conceptului Strategic de Dezvoltare Teritorială a României 2007-2030, INCD Urbanproiect, Bucureşti
24. Ursu, A., Bulai, M. (2012), „Creating, testing and applying a GIS road travel cost model for Romania”. Geographia Technica, 15(1), 8-18, https://technicalgeography.org/pdf/1_2012/02_mihai_bulai_adrian_ursu_creating_testing.pdf
25. Wegener, M., Spiekermann, K., Copus, A. (2002). “Review of Peripherality Indices and Identification of Baseline Indicator”, Deliverable 1 of AsPIRE – Aspatial Peripherality, Innovation, and the Rural Economy. Dortmund/Aberdeen: S&W, IRPUD, SAC.

Text integral/Full text