Rezumat/Abstract. In the field of spatial planning, the quality of documentation depends largely on the quality of the process. Due to the procurement procedures in which the criterion is almost exclusively the lowest price, the quality of the landscaping and urban planning documentation has progressively decreased. This article aims to initiate a scientific approach to identify whether the quality of spatial planning documentation is not due to inadequate project management. For this purpose, the research methodology consisted in investigating the implementation of professional project management, based on new technologies and software in the development of urban planning and spatial planning. The method of sociological analysis used is based on two essential tools for gathering the information needed for a quantitative analysis - the questionnaire and the interview. The finality of the study will highlight the main risks identified in the analysis of the management of urban planning and spatial planning documentation.

Cuvinte cheie/Key words: strategic planning, project management, sociological analysis, questionnaire, interview, general urban plan, county territory development

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54508/rsdu.2021.02

Bibliografie/References

1. Anthopoulos, L. G., Vakali, A. (2012), Urban planning and smart cities: Interrelations and reciprocities. In The Future Internet Assembly, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, pag. 178-189, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30241-1_16.
2. Cowen, D. J. (1988). „GIS versus CAD versus DBMS: What Are the Differences?” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54, 1551-1555, https://web.archive.org/web/20110424091317/http://funk.on.br/esantos/doutorado/GEO/igce/DBMS.pdf.
3. De Wit, A. (1988). „Measurement of project success” International Journal of Project Management, 6(3), 164-170, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(88)90043-9.
4. Faludi, A. (2000). „The performance of spatial planning” Planning practice and Research, 15(4), 299-318, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713691907.
5. Karim, A. J. (2011). „Project management information systems (Pmis) factors: an empirical study of their impact on project management decision making (Pmdm) performance” Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT, 2, https://scispace.com/pdf/project-management-information-systems-pmis-factors-an-2yrnqbkkd6.pdf.
6. Nichersu, I., Iacoboaea, C. (2011). „Systematic spatial planning” Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 6(2), 67-77, https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24873284.pdf.
7. Petrişor, A.-I. (2008). „Levels of biological diversity: a spatial approach to assessment methods” Romanian Review of Regional Studies, 4(1), 41-62, https://rrrs.reviste.ubbcluj.ro/site/arhive/Artpdf/v4n12008/RRRS041200806.pdf.
8. Raymond, L., Bergeron, F. (2008). „Project management information systems: An empirical study of their impact on project managers and project success” International Journal of Project Management, 26(2), 213-220, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.06.002.
9. Steiner, G. A. (1972). „Social policies for business” California Management Review, 15(2), 17-24, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41164414.

Text integral/Full text